A Family History · Begun August 2026

The Randall Tree

Of Peckham, Pimlico & Battersea · By the Record

Record by Record

The documented tree of the family of Randall — begun from its one proven anchor, and grown only as the evidence allows.

4 Living generations in the family record
1802 Earliest year yet in the dossier
140 Records sighted — the work begun

The One Proven Anchor

Where the tree begins

Every family history starts with a question, and this one starts with a name.

The companion history at brydges.randall.london traced the author’s grandmother’s people back through four centuries of Herefordshire record; it ends where her surname does, at her marriage. This site takes up the other half of that marriage: the family of Randall, whose name the author bears.

The first record sighted · GRO marriage index, 1962
Ann Brydges = Alan William Randall
Ann 1937–2014  ·  Alan b. 1936  ·  Married 1962, Wandsworth

The name of Brydges passing into the family of Randall — the point where that history ends and this one begins. Their marriage, registered at Wandsworth in the June quarter of 1962 (vol. 5d, p. 1153), was the first record this history sighted.

Read the Brydges descent

On this side of the marriage, the gathering has begun in earnest. Seventy-eight records are already sighted and logged in the dossier — census returns from 1841 to 1921, parish registers from Southwark, Pimlico and Battersea spanning 1831 to 1931, the 1939 Register, and the General Register Office indexes. Some of them proved a family that turned out not to be ours, which is its own kind of progress. As each further record arrives, it will appear here: the tree first, then the story it carries.

The Story

Nine chapters, as far as the record carries

What follows is drawn only from documents that have been seen. Where a thing is inferred it says so; where only the family remembers it, it says that too. The story stops where the evidence does.

Chapter One

A name and a trade

The oldest Randall we can name is a man called Henry Randall, and he is a greengrocer. That is the whole of it. He appears once, in a single line written by his son on a marriage register in 1893, in the column headed “Father’s Name and Surname”. No age, no birthplace, no address. The clerk did not write “deceased” beside him, which was the usual practice when a father had died, so he was very probably alive that August — and then he is gone again.

Where he was in 1891 is not known. He has been searched for and not found.

Chapter Two

Peckham, and a birth we cannot find

His son — also Henry — was born at Peckham. That much is certain: he gave the same birthplace four times across his adult life, twice in his own handwriting, and never once varied it.

When he was born is another matter, and we do not know. Four records state his age and no two of them agree. He was entered as “21” at his marriage in 1893, which points to 1871 or 1872. The censuses of 1901 and 1911 make him thirty and forty, pointing to 1870. And the census of 1921, which asked for ages in years and months and which he filled in and signed himself, gives fifty-four years and one month — putting his birth in about May 1867, four years before the marriage suggests.

A search that failed, and why it is left standing

This history once identified his birth registration confidently: the only Henry Randall registered in the Camberwell district across five years, in the September quarter of 1871. The certificate was ordered. It came back as the birth of an illegitimate child in the Camberwell workhouse — and the workhouse death register then showed that that boy died there at the age of two, two days short of his second birthday. He was somebody else’s son, and he did not live.

The reasoning had leaned on the marriage register’s “21”. But “21” on a Victorian marriage register is frequently not an age at all — it is the formula for of full age, meaning old enough to marry without consent. His bride was written down as 21 at the same wedding and was about twenty and a half. A number that was really a formula was used as a measuring instrument, and it pointed at the wrong child.

So the registration is unfound, and the search now runs from 1866 rather than 1869. It is possible he was never registered at all: compulsion arrived only with the Act of 1874.

Chapter Three

The shop in St Leonard Street

On 6 August 1893, at St Peter’s, Pimlico, Henry marries Ellen Willby. He is twenty-one and already a greengrocer, living in St Leonard Street. She is the daughter of George Willby, a stonemason’s labourer whose own people came from Walpole in Suffolk. Both of them sign their names in a clear hand; neither makes a mark. Two Hawleys witness it.

St Leonard Street ran off the Vauxhall Bridge Road, among Gillingham Street, Hindon Street and the Tachbrooks. It does not exist today. Whether it was renamed or swept away has not yet been established.

By the census of 1901 Henry is thirty and the return records him as a greengrocer and an employer — his own shop, at number 7. There is a servant in the house, Anney Willby, almost certainly Ellen’s sister, and three boarders paying rent. This is a family with a business, a staff and a spare room.

What is not claimed

It would be neat to say he inherited the shop from his father, and this history said so for a day. The 1891 census does not support it: no Randall of any kind lived in St Leonard Street then. He came to the street some time between 1891 and his marriage, and the shop became his later. Whose it was before him is unknown.

Chapter Four

Nine in three rooms

Then it goes wrong, and the census records it without comment. By 1911 Henry is still a greengrocer, but the return calls him a worker. He is no longer his own master and the shop is gone. The family has crossed the river to 450 Garratt Lane in Battersea, where nine people live in three rooms.

Ellen’s portion of the same return records eight children born alive and six then living. Two have died in the intervening decade, and they are not named anywhere.

By 1921 he is a greengrocer’s assistant, working for a Mr Hancock on the Wandsworth Bridge Road. Employer, worker, assistant: his own trade, three descending steps, twenty years. What caused the fall is the largest unanswered question in this history.

Chapter Five

The children scatter

The 1921 census catches the household at the moment the children go out into the new century’s industries, and none of them into the fruit trade. Ivy Vera, twenty-one, is polishing gramophone records at the Columbia works in Earlsfield. Lillian, nineteen, makes gas mantles for the Welsbach Lighting Company. Thomas Arthur, sixteen, clerks for a drapery on Friday Street in the City. Edward Joseph, twenty-four, makes cases in Fulham.

And the youngest boy, Alfred William, fourteen years and ten months old, is a hand at a saw mill on Townmead Road.

Chapter Six

Alfred

Alfred’s life is short and almost entirely legible. Born in Battersea about August 1906. Out of school and into the saw mill at fourteen. By twenty-five he is an asphalter — hot, heavy, outdoor work — living at 14 Este Road.

On 2 August 1931, at Christ Church, Battersea, he marries Mildred Woodstock. Her brother George signs as a witness. She comes from a music-hall family: her father, John Richard Woodstock, painted scenery for the London Theatres of Varieties at the Islington Empire, her brother followed him into the same trade, and her sister sold tickets at the Grand Palace, Clapham Junction.

In the second quarter of 1939 Alfred dies. He is thirty-two. The death is registered in Lambeth. There is no grant of probate: he left nothing to prove. His son Alan is not yet three.

Chapter Seven

Winstanley Road, September 1939

Three weeks before the country goes to war, the National Register finds what is left of them. At 101 Winstanley Road — the house the Woodstocks had held for more than thirty years — Mildred is recorded as a widow of thirty-one, working as a sewing machinist.

Beneath her name sits an entry the government still keeps closed, because the person may yet be living. On the family’s record that is Alan. Below them both is her mother Catherine, seventy-three, and against her the enumerator has written that she is incapacitated. Three generations, no man in the house, and the Blitz a year away.

Chapter Eight

Cornwall

Battersea, with its railway lands and its power station, was heavily bombed from the autumn of 1940. At some point after that, mother and son were evacuated to Cornwall, and Alan was taken in by a family there.

He stayed. Long afterwards, and after the marriage that closes this history, he married the daughter of the family who had taken him in. They live in Cornwall still.

The family’s record

This chapter rests on the family’s own account and no document has yet been seen for it. The Register places them still in Battersea on 29 September 1939, so the move was later than the first evacuation. A school admission register in the receiving parish would evidence it, since evacuee children were entered with their home addresses.

Epilogue

Wandsworth, 1962

In the June quarter of 1962, at Wandsworth, Alan William Randall marries Ann Brydges — and this history joins the other one, the four centuries of Herefordshire record that ends where her surname does.

Two families arriving at the same few square miles of south-west London from opposite directions: hers descending out of Hereford gentry through five generations of city trades, his coming up out of Peckham greengrocery. There is even a moment when they nearly touch. In 1911 the Brydges family lived at 130 Townmead Road, Fulham. Ten years later Alfred Randall worked at a saw mill in the same street. It is a coincidence and nothing more — but they were within yards of one another, forty years before anybody married anybody.

The Other Line

The Eburns: Portsmouth, Southampton, Nairobi

The maternal line runs on entirely different ground from the Randalls — Hampshire rather than London, and then out of England altogether. Two chapters of it are hard reading. They are set down here as the records have them, because a history that leaves such things out is not a history.

Chapter One

A boy of fourteen, HMS Leander

In 1841 a woman called Charlotte Eburn was living in a lodging house in Bishop Street, Portsea, with a son of five and a daughter a week old. No husband is entered. In a Portsmouth lodging house that usually meant a man at sea, but the record does not say, and neither will this.

The boy of five was Joseph William Eburn. On 30 September 1850, aged about fourteen, he joined HMS Leander as a boy second class. He moved to HMS Sidon in October 1852 and stayed on her books until July 1856 — which is to say through the whole of the Crimean War, in which that ship served. He was rated boy first class, then ordinary seaman. His character is entered as very good, then very good, then fair. He came ashore from HMS Victory on 24 May 1857.

Where that ship went

HMS Sidon was a wooden paddle frigate of 1,329 tons, designed by Sir Charles Napier and named for his attack on the port of Sidon in 1840. Under Captain George Goldsmith she spent the war in the Black Sea. In April 1854 she blockaded the coast from Kavarna to the mouths of the Danube. That September she escorted the French troop transports carrying the invasion to the Crimea, and helped the grounded French battleship Algiers off Eupatoria. On 4 October 1854 she shelled a marching column of twelve thousand Russian troops, and a Russian rocket hit her funnel. On 17 October 1854 she was at the first bombardment of Sevastopol — a sketch of the city from the sea was drawn from her deck. In May 1855 she was with the fleet that forced the Strait of Kertch and opened the Sea of Azov. And on 17 October 1855 she took a leading part in the attack on Fort Kinburn, at the mouth of the Dnieper — an action generally reckoned the first in which armoured warships ever fought.

He was on her books for all of it: a boy first class, about eighteen, at Sevastopol; an ordinary seaman, about nineteen, at Kinburn. What he personally did on either day is not recorded, and is not guessed at here.

Thirteen years later, on 25 May 1870, the Board of Trade granted him a Certificate of Competency as Mate of a Home Trade Passenger Ship. A boy second class at fourteen; a certificated officer at thirty-four. It is the most upward document in this whole history.

Chapter Two

Ashore, at Southampton

He married Mary, a Hampshire woman from Ashton, by Bishops Waltham, and by 1871 they were at Western Terrace in St Mary’s, Southampton, with a son of one and a daughter of a month. He gave his trade that year simply as seaman. A directory has him as a ship engineer in Milford Terrace. By 1881 he was a dock head man — the sea behind him, the docks in front.

By then they were at All Saints with four children, the youngest a month old and the third a boy of three called Frank. Ten years later the household had moved to 93 St Andrews Road and the children had gone out to work: William a solicitor’s clerk at twenty-one, Harry apprenticed to boot-riveting at fifteen, Ernest and Rosa at school, and Frank thirteen. There was a lodger who taught music.

Chapter Three

Frank

Frank Eburn was born in Southampton in 1877. By his early twenties he was a painter and paperhanger.

On 17 November 1899 the Police Gazette — the national circular of persons wanted by the police — carried this entry under Hampshire:

Police Gazette, 17 November 1899

“Southampton (Borough). For stealing a purse containing £6 — FRANK EBURN, age 22, height 5 ft. 7 or 8 in., complexion pale, hair and moustache light brown, eyes (supposed) grey; dress, when last seen, black cloth coat and vest, blue cloth trousers, light tie, hard felt hat. A painter and paperhanger, native of Southampton. Warrant issued. Information to the Chief Constable, Southampton.”

The same entry ran again on 24 November and on 1 December. Then, on 22 December 1899, the Gazette printed this:

Police Gazette, 22 December 1899

“Southampton (Borough). FRANK EBURN, Case No. 23, 17th ult., not now wanted. Warrant withdrawn.”

Five weeks, and then the police stopped looking for him. He does not appear in that week’s list of men apprehended; he appears among the warrants cancelled. A withdrawn warrant usually means the complainant declined to go on, or the matter was settled, or the case fell apart — the Gazette gives no reason, and none is guessed at here. It is not a finding of innocence, because no court ever ruled. But no prosecution seems to have followed, and the whole episode lasted thirty-five days.

The entry is also, incidentally, the only description of any ancestor in this history. Nothing else we have found — in four hundred years of record on the other side of the family, or anywhere on this one — says what a single one of them looked like.

About 1900 he married Alice, a Southampton woman eight years older than himself who had been married before. Four children were born to them and two lived: Ivy in 1905 and William Joseph in 1909. In April 1911 Frank filled in the census himself at 58 Lower Alfred Street, six rooms, and gave his trade as house painter in shipbuilding.

Fifteen months later, on 23 July 1912, he died at that address. The cause was poisoning by coal gas. The coroner for Southampton opened an inquest the following day and the verdict was recorded as “whilst of unsound mind” — the formula a coroner used, in that period, where a death was found to be suicide. Frank was thirty-five.

Chapter Four

The boy of three

William Joseph Eburn, born at Ilford on 30 January 1909, was three years and six months old when his father died. Ivy was seven. Alice was widowed for at least the second time, with two small children and a grown stepdaughter.

It is worth setting beside what happens on the other side of this family. Alfred Randall died in 1939 at thirty-two and left a son of three. Frank Eburn died in 1912 at thirty-five and left a son of three. The two lines had nothing to do with one another for another fifty years.

Chapter Five

Nairobi

On 14 May 1928, at nineteen, William Joseph was appointed a temporary clerk in the Survey and Registration Department in Kenya. He stayed in the colonial service for the rest of his working life: a clerk in Lands and Settlement by 1938, a Land Assistant by 1953. The Nairobi South voters’ list of 1936 gives him as a civil servant at Box 89. He volunteered before the war for the Kenya Regiment, number 797.

In 1938 he came home to Southampton to marry Patricia Marion Stearn, and took her back out. In February 1946 she sailed from Liverpool for Durban with two small boys — Brian, six, and Peter Graham John, not quite five. A daughter, Maureen Patricia Joyce, was born at Nairobi on 12 May 1949 and died there on 1 May 1951, eleven days short of two years old. The family came home through London in 1954 and went back again. Patricia died at Nairobi on 29 December 1964, aged fifty.

Peter Graham John Eburn was born at Nairobi on 28 March 1941. His birth was not registered for twenty-two years: his mother walked into the registrar’s office and did it herself on 20 July 1963, five months before Kenyan independence, at a moment when British families in the colony were putting their papers in order. His father is entered on the certificate as retired.

Peter served in the Kenya Regiment too — number 7189, an intake a generation after his father’s, in the last years of the colony. And he made his working life in the crop the country was built on: a two-part article survives in the family’s papers, The Story of Coffee, by Peter Eburn, written with the assurance of a man who knew pulping and fermentation and drying tables from the inside. It carries his photograph — the first likeness of anyone in this history.

William Joseph married again at Hereford in 1972 and died at Belmont Abbey there on 4 March 1982.

Chapter Six

Dublin

Her father was Albert Victor Stearn, born at Gosport on 23 January 1886 and baptised in the Wesleyan-Methodist chapel there. Behind him stands a line of tailors. His great-grandfather William Stearn was a tailor at Grantchester; his grandfather Frederic King Stearn, born there on 24 July 1828, married Emma Darnell in 1849 and kept a tailor’s business at Swan’s Yard in Trumpington, employing one boy — and ended up at Fulbourn keeping a public house, the Rising Sun, still tailoring at sixty-two. His father Albert David Stearn was a tailor lodging in Cambridge at twenty-five, a soldier by the time he married Mary Elizabeth Webb at Fulbourn in 1885, an army tailor at Chatham by 1901 — and by 1906, when he dropped dead in a shop at Gillingham, master tailor to the Royal Engineers. The family lived at New Brompton, beside Brompton Barracks, the Corps’ own headquarters. A boy raised there joined the Royal Engineers, and Albert Victor did: when he married in 1912 the register calls him a sapper, stationed at the Ordnance Survey Office in Dublin. But the Survey’s business is printing maps, and the 1939 Register finds him at Southampton as a litho printer at the Ordnance Office. He was a tradesman in uniform, and it is almost certainly why he appears in no First World War medal roll: skilled lithographers at survey establishments were not sent to France.

It also answers a question this history could not otherwise have answered. The Ordnance Survey’s headquarters was at Southampton — which is how a girl born in County Dublin, to a family from Cambridgeshire and Gosport, came to marry a Southampton man in 1938. The maps brought them there.

Patricia’s own people came from further off still. The 1921 census finds a London household holding four Stearns: Mary E. Stearn, a widow of sixty-six born at Fulbourn in Cambridgeshire; her daughter-in-law Mary, thirty-five, born at Kells in County Meath; and three small grandchildren — Patricia, aged seven years and three months, Doreen aged three, and Albert aged two — all three born in County Dublin.

The census was taken in June 1921, during the Irish War of Independence and weeks before the truce. Why the family had left Dublin for London is not recorded, and is not guessed at here.

A useful accident

The 1921 census asked for ages in years and months rather than years alone. Patricia at seven years and three months dates her birth to about 19 March 1914 — and an independent record of British residents in East Africa gives it as 17 March 1914. Two sources, agreeing within two days.

The Fourth Quarter

The Wrights & Coles: a field, a bench, a boardroom

This quarter of the ascent had nothing against it at all — not one record — until a single evening in August 2026 put thirteen on the table. It turned out to hold the plainest rise in the whole history, a cavalryman nobody knew about, and a week in 1968 that took three of them.

Chapter One

Two Norfolk people go north

On 18 September 1831 the banns were called in the parish church at Thurton, in the Loddon country of south Norfolk, between Robert Wright of this parish, bachelor, and Mary Ann Rowland of the parish of Rockland. They were called again on the 25th and again on 2 October, and on 13 October 1831 they were married in her church at Rockland St Mary by the curate, Richard Lubbock.

Then the register was signed, and neither of them could do it. Robert Wright made his mark. Mary Ann Rowland made hers. So did the witness, Elizabeth Rowland. On the same page a third couple were married that autumn by licence rather than banns, and both of them wrote their names — the whole social gradient of the parish, in one opening of one book.

They settled at Carleton St Peter and had a great many children. By the census of 1851 Robert was forty-seven, an agricultural labourer born at Kirstead, and there were eight of them in the house by the church: Robert, John, William, Martha, Margaret, Mary Ann, Thomas aged three, and Samuel at one. The parish register is exact about Thomas. He was born on 20 December 1847 and baptised on 16 January 1848, and it names his father Robert, husbandman, and his mother Mary Anne.

Robert Wright was buried at Thurton on 29 August 1876, aged sixty-seven — in the parish where he had called his banns forty-five years before.

His son Thomas went a very long way from it, and we know almost exactly how. Some time before 1875 he left Norfolk on his own for Middlesbrough, six hours and a world away, where the ironworks were swallowing labourers as fast as they could arrive. And on 18 May 1875 he came back to be married.

The bride was Chlorinda Spanton, twenty-six, of Blofield — the daughter of John Spanton, farmer, who held twenty acres and whose son was a miller. Thomas gave his own residence as Middlesbrough and his trade as labourer, and named his father Robert Wright, labourer. They were married in her parish church after banns, and her sister or aunt Susannah Spanton witnessed it.

Then they signed. Chlorinda wrote her name in a clear, practised hand. Thomas made a cross. Like his father before him, he could not write.

She went north with him. Two sons were born at Middlesbrough — Robert J about 1876 and Alfred E in December 1877 — and then, between about 1878 and 1880, they came home. By the census of 1881 they were at Hemblington, in a lane containing a bricklayer, an agricultural labourer of seventy-one still working, a widowed vermin destroyer and a charwoman, and not one shopkeeper or tradesman. Their daughter Agnes had been born there. A farmer’s literate daughter had married a labourer who could not sign his name, and this was where it had brought her.

How the line closes

They came home to Blofield, and on 11 August 1878 the rector christened both boys at once — Robert John and Alfred Edward, entries 1285 and 1286, sons of Thomas and Chlorinda Wright, labourer, of Blofield. Neither had been baptised in Yorkshire. That single page dates the family’s return to within eight months, and it names Alfred Edward Wright’s parents outright.

Robert Wright is named as Thomas’s father twice — at the font in 1848 and at the altar in 1875 — from two registers twenty-seven years apart. Thomas and Chlorinda are named as Alfred Edward’s parents at the font in 1878. Every link from 1809 to the present is now carried by a record.

And one thread runs the length of it. In 1831 Robert Wright and Mary Ann Rowland both signed with a mark. In 1875 Thomas Wright signed with a mark. In 1911 and again in 1921 Alfred Edward Wright filled in and signed his own census schedules, and his son Frank became a surveyor and draughtsman — a man paid to write and draw.

It is tempting to credit his mother, the literate farmer’s daughter who married in. The likelier answer is duller and larger. Alfred was born in December 1877. The Education Act of 1870 built the board schools and the Act of 1880 made attendance compulsory; he reached school age in about 1882. He belongs to the first English generation for whom school was not optional, and he is the first man in five generations of this family who could write his own name. Everything the Wrights did afterwards stands on the far side of that.

This quarter of the family had not one document against it when the work began. The test that broke a false line elsewhere in this history — hunt for divergence, and trust nothing that shows any — was run against this one and found four agreements and no contradictions.

Chapter Two

Thirty-five Peterborough Road

On census night 1911 the labourer’s son was at 35 Peterborough Road, Leyton, six rooms, and he filled in the schedule himself. Alfred E Wright, thirty-three, builder’s foreman. His wife Ada Maud, twenty-eight — baptised Ada Maud Wood at Waltham Abbey on 27 August 1882 and known all her life by the second name. They had married in that same parish church, and her father John Wood is named in both registers. Four children: Thomas G seven, Frank E five, Margery two, and Doris at four months. Hackney for the first three, Leyton for the last — the move is dated by the babies.

The marriage column says married eight years, four children born alive, four still living, none died. In a history that keeps turning up households broken early — a house painter dead at thirty-five, a mother dead at thirty-four, an asphalter dead at thirty-two — this is the one that the period left alone.

He stayed. The house appears again in 1921, in 1927 and again in 1932. In a dossier of families that moved every few years across Peckham, Pimlico, Battersea, Southampton and Nairobi, the Wrights of Leyton sat still for over twenty years.

Where she came from

Ada Maud Wood grew up at 68 New Road, Upshire, in the parish of Waltham Holy Cross. Her father John Wood, born at Roydon about 1851, was a millman in the gunpowder factory — which at Waltham Abbey means the government powder works, the most unusual trade anywhere in this history. Her mother Ellen was a Waltham Abbey woman. In 1901, aged eighteen, Ada Maud was a cook in domestic service; her brother John, at fifteen, was a farm labourer. A year or two later she married a builder’s foreman in the abbey church she had been baptised in.

On the same census night, four miles away at Woodford, there was another Maud Wood — also eighteen, also born at Waltham Abbey, also in service. She is not the same woman: ours was baptised Ada Maud, and that one is entered as Maud E. The Upshire household is the right one because it names both her parents. It is a reminder of how thin the ice can be.

He filled in a census schedule once more, in June 1921, and it is the most detailed of the three. There were now five children — a fifth, Sidney, had been born at Leyton in about May 1913. Thomas at seventeen was a junior clerk in the secretary’s office at Messrs Lipton Ltd, the grocers, on City Road. Frank at fifteen was an apprentice carpenter and joiner to W. S. Sharpin, builder and contractor, of Wellington Road, Bow. And Alfred himself was no longer in building at all: he was works foreman at a cabinet works, R. Eustace & Co, furniture manufacturers of Bethnal Green Road.

What the years and months prove

The 1921 census asked for ages in years and months. Frank’s birthday is known exactly from another record — 13 January 1906 — and his mother’s from her baptism, 30 July 1882. Both land precisely on 19 June 1921, the night the census was actually taken.

Which means Alfred’s own entry can be read the same way. At 43 years and 6 months he was born in December 1877 — not October, as the family has it. Five records agree on December; only the family’s memory says otherwise. His father Thomas had been born on 20 December 1847, thirty years and a day or two before.

Chapter Three

Whipps Cross Lodge, No. 4642

His father had signed a marriage register with a cross in 1875. On 9 March 1927, aged forty-nine, Alfred Edward Wright was initiated into Whipps Cross Lodge. The register gives his address as Leyton and his occupation as builders manager. He was passed in May and raised in September. For the whole of his membership the lodge met at the Great Eastern Hotel at Liverpool Street Station, which had two purpose-built masonic temples; one of them is still there.

He was Junior Warden in 1937, Senior Warden in 1938 and again in 1939 — and then nothing until he took the chair as Worshipful Master in 1942. The two missing years are 1940 and 1941. A London lodge meeting at a mainline terminus through the Blitz is the obvious explanation, but the register does not say so and neither will this. He was given London Grand Rank in 1956, at about seventy-eight, and remained a member until he died.

Chapter Four

The watchmakers of Bexley Heath

The other half of this quarter kept a different sort of bench. In 1881 Mortimer G. Cole, thirty-seven, a watchmaker born in London, was living on the Main Road at Bexley Heath in Kent with his wife Eleanor, a Bexley Heath woman, five children and a servant from Saltash. The eldest was a boy of eight, Mortimer T. Cole.

Ten years later the family was in the Market Place, the household had grown to nine children, Eleanor was being written down as Ellen, and the boy of eight was eighteen and a watchmaker beside his father.

Chapter Five

The trooper

He did not stay at the bench. On 9 May 1894, aged twenty-one years and five months, Mortimer Townly Cole stood in front of a magistrate and attested for the 4th Dragoon Guards — regular heavy cavalry. He gave his trade as clockmaker and his birthplace as the parish of Bexley, near Erith. Asked whether he already belonged to any force, he answered yes: the 4th Middlesex Rifle Volunteers. He signed for the full engagement, seven years with the colours and five in the reserve.

This family was thought to have almost no military history. It has a cavalryman, and the paper he signed survives with his name on it twice.

The date is the interesting part. 1894 is the year the 4th Dragoon Guards sailed for India, on what became a fourteen-year posting — the regiment’s first ever, after eighty years of garrison duty broken only by the charge of the Heavy Brigade at Balaklava and by Tel-el-Kebir. He signed on in May of that year.

And yet he cannot have gone for long. He married in England about 1899, and his son was born at Streatham in 1901 — while his regiment was still on the other side of the world, and while his seven years with the colours still had time to run.

The answer is that he changed regiments. A second set of service papers has him as 3186 Cole, Royal Horse Guards — the Blues, part of the Household Cavalry, the sovereign’s mounted guard, quartered at Knightsbridge and Windsor. The Household Cavalry does not go to India. He did not come home early from the East; he transferred out of a regiment that was leaving into one that stays, and spent the rest of his soldiering within reach of the woman he married.

An open question, and a good one

The Household Cavalry did go somewhere. On the outbreak of the South African War a Composite Regiment was raised from one squadron each of the 1st Life Guards, the 2nd Life Guards and the Royal Horse Guards. It sailed on 30 November 1899, reached the Cape after Christmas, and rode with French’s cavalry through the Relief of Kimberley and Paardeberg.

He married in 1899. The regiment sailed at the end of November that year. Only one squadron of the Blues went, and the rest stayed in London, so this proves nothing at all — but unlike a garrison posting, a campaign leaves medal rolls. If 3186 Cole is on the Queen’s South Africa roll, he was there, by name and number, with the clasps naming the actions.

Chapter Six

Croxted Road, 2 April 1911

Seventeen years after the attestation, on the same night that Alfred Wright was filling in his schedule in Leyton, Mortimer Townly Cole was filling in his at 172 Croxted Road, West Dulwich — seven rooms and a servant. He gave his trade as engineer’s traveller, addressing machines: the watchmaker’s son had gone into office machinery, a business barely twenty years old.

His wife was Emma Louisa, thirty-four, born in Peckham. Their son Roland was nine, their daughter Joan six, and the youngest was Molly Blanche Cole, nine months old. The marriage column reads eleven years, four children born alive, three living, one died. Staying in the house that night were Leonard Oliver Archer, a draper’s traveller from Chigwell, his wife and their two infants — and Archer was Emma Louisa’s maiden name.

Emma Louisa died later that same year, at about thirty-four. Molly was not yet two. This census is almost certainly the last record of her alive.

Chapter Seven

St Pancras, July 1932

The banns were called at St Pancras on the twelfth, nineteenth and twenty-sixth of June 1932: Frank Edward Wright, bachelor, of St Paul Leyton, and Molly Blanche Cole, spinster, of this parish. They were married in the parish church the following month.

The register gives him as twenty-six and a builder, of 35 Peterborough Road, Leyton — the same house he had been carried into as a baby twenty-one years earlier. It gives her as twenty-two, of 24 Harmood Street, Chalk Farm. His father is entered as Alfred Edward Wright, builder; hers as Mortimer Cole, salesman. And beneath the couple’s own signatures are the two witnesses: Mortimer Cole and Alfred Edward Wright. Both fathers signed for it.

By 1939 Frank and Molly were at Eastern Avenue in Romford and he was entered as a director, surveyor and draughtsman. From an apprenticeship at fifteen to a directorship at thirty-three. The family remembers a firm called A. E. Wright and Sons — though in 1921 Alfred was an employee at a furniture works and Frank was apprenticed to somebody else’s building business, so if the firm existed it did not exist yet.

From a Norfolk field to a boardroom took three generations and about sixty years, and every step of it is named by a record. It was not a straight line: Alfred was a foreman rather than a builder as such, and the material he worked in changed from bricks to furniture and back again. What carried through the family was not a trade. It was the habit of being the man who ran the workshop.

Chapter Eight

Four days in 1968

Alfred Edward Wright was a member of his lodge until he died, and the register gives the year as 1968. So does the family. What the family adds is the shape of it.

Frank Edward Wright died first. He was sixty-two. Two days later his mother, Maud, died. The day after that, Alfred died, aged ninety. Son, wife, husband, inside four days.

The household that the 1911 census had marked out as the one the period left alone — four children, none lost — held for fifty-seven years and then went in a single week. This last is the family’s account, given by a woman who lost her father and both her grandparents in it, and it has not yet been checked against the three death registrations. It is set down as she told it.

The Tree, As It Stands

Eight generations, by the evidence

The author’s ascent, drawn as far as the records and the family’s word now carry it — and marked so that the two can be told apart. Note where the dashed connectors fall: it is the recent generations that want proof, not the distant ones. Names of the living are withheld. The chart grows as the dossier does.

The author Living two further generations beneath
Father = Mother Living · m. 1988, Tunbridge Wells proven by the GRO index; names withheld
Alan William Randall = Ann Brydges b. 1936 · 1937–2014 · m. 1962 the junction with the Brydges
Alfred William Randall = Mildred Woodstock c. 1906–1939 · 1907–untraced asphalter, dead at 32; m. 1931, Battersea
Henry Randall = Ellen Willby c. 1867–71 · c. 1873 · m. 6 Aug 1893, Pimlico greengrocer; his father Henry, greengrocer
John Richard Woodstock = Catherine c. 1866 · b. 1866, d. after 1939 decorator to the music halls
John James Brydges = Annie Louisa Edwards 1907–1977 · 1913–1993 of Hamble Street, Fulham
William Charles Brydges = Annie Louisa Knapp 1881–1967 · 1881–1928 fourteen generations — the Brydges descent
Not yet traced the Edwards ascent
Peter Graham John Eburn = Grandmother 1941–2011 · Living born Nairobi; Kenya Regiment 7189
William Joseph Eburn = Patricia Marion Stearn 1909–1982 · 1914–1964 · m. 1938 colonial civil service, Nairobi
Frank Eburn = Alice Margaret Gray 1877–1912 · b. 1869 · m. 1899, Islington house painter, of Southampton
Joseph William Eburn = Mary c. 1836 · c. 1845, Bishops Waltham Royal Navy; certificated Mate, 1870
Joseph Eburn = Charlotte Poynter b. c. 1802, Warwick · b. c. 1814 · m. 1834, Wilts Royal Marines, then Navy; Greenwich Pensioner
Albert Victor Stearn = Mary O’Reilly 1886–1956 · 1887–untraced · m. 1912, Kells litho printer, Ordnance Survey; she a nurse
Albert David Stearn = Mary Elizabeth Webb c. 1856–1906 · b. c. 1856 · m. 1885, Fulbourn master tailor to the Royal Engineers
Frederic King Stearn = Emma Darnell b. 24 Jul 1828, Grantchester · b. c. 1829 · m. 1849 tailor; later kept the Rising Sun, Fulbourn
William Stearne = Ann of Grantchester, 1828 tailor; her surname perhaps King
David Webb untraced · of Fulbourn, Cambs labourer
James O’Reilly untraced · of Kells, Co. Meath farmer
Frank Edward Wright = Molly Blanche Cole 1906–1968 · 1910–1987 · m. 9 Jul 1932, St Pancras builder, then a director; both fathers witnessed
Alfred Edward Wright = Ada Maud Wood c. Dec 1877–1968 · 1882–1968 · five children foreman — building, then furniture, then building
Thomas Wright = Chlorinda Spanton b. 20 Dec 1847 · b. c. 1849 · m. 18 May 1875, Blofield labourer, signed with his mark; she a farmer’s daughter
Robert Wright = Mary Ann Rowland c. 1809–1876 · b. c. 1814 · m. 13 Oct 1831, Rockland St Mary husbandman; both signed the register with a mark
John Spanton = Elizabeth b. c. 1821, Gt Yarmouth · b. c. 1821, Blofield farmer of twenty acres, at Blofield
John Wood = Ellen b. c. 1851, Roydon · b. c. 1858, Waltham Abbey millman at the Waltham Abbey gunpowder mills
Mortimer Townly Cole = Emma Louisa Archer c. 1872–1941 · c. 1877–1911 · m. c. 1899 watchmaker; 4th Dragoon Guards, then the Blues
Mortimer G Cole = Eleanor b. c. 1844 · b. c. 1850, Bexley Heath watchmaker, of Bexley Heath, Kent
Documented by a sighted record The family’s record, awaiting proof Not yet traced Parentage not yet proven by record Use the − buttons to fold a branch away

Where the tree stops, and why

The Randall line ends here, at Henry and Ellen, and it ends deliberately. The family’s own tree carries it four generations further, back into the eighteenth century, through a Josiah Randall of Bermondsey. Those people are real and their records are excellent — a baptism of 1831, a marriage of 1851, seven census returns. They are also, on the evidence, a different family.

Josiah had a son Henry, born the same year as ours. But Josiah’s Henry was born in Bermondsey, worked as a clerk, and was living with his parents in Bermondsey in 1891. Ours was born in Peckham, was a greengrocer, and married out of Pimlico in 1893 — declaring, in his own hand, that his father was Henry Randall, greengrocer. A shared forename, a shared surname and a shared birth year are not an ancestor.

The birth registers settle it. Searching the index for Henry Randall across south London turns up two separate births nine months apart: one in St Olave Southwark — the district that had just absorbed Bermondsey — in the last quarter of 1870, and one in Camberwell, the district covering Peckham, in the autumn of 1871. The first is Josiah’s son. The second is ours.

So the eighteenth century comes off the chart until the joint can be remade. Somewhere in Peckham there was a greengrocer named Henry Randall who has not yet been found, and until he is, this is where the line honestly stops.

The Work Ahead

Built record by record

Gather

The family’s papers

Certificates, photographs, the family’s own tree. Each paper becomes an entry in the research dossier; every answer is logged with its source.

Prove

Records, sighted

GRO indexes, parish registers, census returns — claim by claim, with a facsimile of the page beside the passage it evidences.

Tell

The tree, then the story

First the proven chart, then the chapters it carries — exactly as the Brydges history was built, one sighted record at a time.